AI-Graded Written Response

Type your response below. Our AI scores it 1–4 using the same rubric as the real NES exam.

Prompt

Student Scenario

Student: Maya | Grade: 2

Exhibit 1 — Teacher Record

Early in the school year, Maya reads aloud a passage from an unfamiliar narrative text. The teacher records the following:

"Sam and his dog Rex ran down the muddy trail."

↳ Maya read "muddy" as "mudy" (substitution)

"Rex jumped over a log and landed in a puddle."

↳ Maya read "jumped" as "jumpt" then self-corrected | read "landed" as "land" (substitution)

"Sam laughed and wiped mud from his face."

↳ Maya paused long on "laughed" | read "wiped" as "wipe" (substitution)

"They raced all the way home as the sun began to set."

↳ Maya repeated "raced" | read "began" as "begin" (substitution)

Exhibit 2 — Oral Fluency Reading Rubric

Words correct per minute71 wcpm

Accuracy88%

Pace (1–4)3

Smoothness (1–4)2

Phrasing (1–4)3

Note: Second-grade 50th percentile fall benchmark is 72 wcpm.

Assignment

Using your knowledge of foundational reading skills (e.g., phonemic awareness, phonics, recognition of high-frequency words, syllabication, morphemic analysis, automaticity, reading fluency [accuracy, rate, and prosody], self-correcting), write a response of approximately 150–300 words in which you:

1.Identify one significant strength that Maya demonstrates related to foundational reading skills.
2.Identify one significant need that Maya demonstrates related to foundational reading skills.
3.Based on the need you identified, describe an appropriate instructional strategy, activity, or intervention to use with Maya.
4.Explain why the instructional strategy, activity, or intervention you described would be effective for Maya.

Be sure to cite specific evidence from the information provided to support all parts of your response.

Scoring Rubric

4 — Thorough

Purpose fully achieved. Substantial, accurate knowledge. Sound evidence and high-quality examples.

3 — Adequate

Purpose largely achieved. Generally accurate knowledge. Adequate evidence with relevant examples.

2 — Limited

Purpose partially achieved. Limited or possibly inaccurate knowledge. Few relevant examples.

1 — Weak

Purpose not achieved. Little or no accurate knowledge. Weak or absent evidence.

Your Response0 words (min 150)